| Location: Ministry Home > News > Minister's Speeches > Speech |
Ontario Legislature
Toronto, ON
October 18, 2006
(Check against delivery)
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It is my pleasure to introduce Bill 43, the
proposed Clean Water Act, for third reading.
This is a great and long-awaited day for the province of Ontario.
Today we consider a piece of legislation that will fundamentally transform
the way we protect our greatest natural resource: our water.
As the Honourable Members know, as representatives of the people of
this great province, we have the rare and valuable opportunity to
truly make a meaningful difference in the lives of Ontarians — not
only for today, but for generations to come.
There can be no better opportunity than the one we debate today. Ontario
could never have developed into the diverse and thriving, province
it is today without a constant supply of clean, safe drinking water.
But the quality and the quantity of our water are not boundless. We
must manage our water responsibly.
Bill 43 gives us an opportunity to protect Ontario’s environment and
also leave an important legacy for our children.
I am very proud to be proposing legislation that has the potential
to make such a profound and lasting contribution to Ontario’s environmental
well-being, and to the quality of life our people enjoy.
Our government’s vision is of a province where our children can live
and play in strong, healthy, vibrant communities … an Ontario that
is clean and green … progressive and prosperous.
This is our government’s vision and it is also a vision that is shared
by people across our province.
We know that Ontarians, when asked, will clearly state their profound
belief that the environment is a top priority, along with health and
education.
Notre gouvernement a comme vision une province où les enfants
peuvent vivre et grandir dans des collectivités fortes, salubres
et dynamiques … un Ontario propre et vert … prospère et en
plein essor.
Cette vision du gouvernement est partagée par les citoyens
et les citoyennes de la province.
En effet, les Ontariens et les Ontariennes déclarent que l’environnement
constitue une priorité pour eux, comme la santé et l’éducation.
Our government is working on many fronts to realize that vision, and
many different ministries and agencies are involved.
Unlike some of our predecessors, the McGuinty government understands
that Ontarians want effective environmental stewardship from their
representatives at Queen’s Park.
We take our stewardship very seriously. We are committed to upholding
the trust placed in us to manage environmental issues wisely on behalf
of Ontarians.
And as stewards, our role is to ensure that environmental protection
is being managed at the most effective and appropriate level.
I want to take a few minutes today to remind the Honourable Members
of the purpose of Bill 43, and briefly describe how it is designed
to work in communities across the province.
But first, I want to highlight the extensive consultation process
we have undertaken for this bill, and how that has helped to make
the proposed legislation even stronger, and more effective.
Mr. Speaker, our government consulted with more than 300 groups across
the province.
We heard from farmers and municipal leaders, large industry and small
businesses, conservation groups and health officials, First Nations
and property owners. We listened, and we took action on what we heard.
There is no better example of this than our drinking water stewardship
program for rural Ontario. Property owners and small businesses told
us that they needed financial help to make changes and implement their
plans.
We heard their concerns, and we responded. We built our financial
assistance program right into the legislation itself. Initially, $7
million dollars will be available for early action to protect drinking
water. What’s more, we have promised farmers and rural business owners
that this is only our initial funding; there will be more.
To ensure that future funding is well invested and meets the needs
of rural Ontario, I appointed an 11-member Advisory Panel, to be chaired
by Al Lauzon, a past chair of the Ontario Rural Council. The panel
will provide invaluable advice and expertise in designing the program.
As communities complete their source protection plans, we’ll know
better what the costs of implementation are, and how to effectively
direct sustainable future funding to address those costs.
Speaker, it is actions like these that prompted Ron Bonnett from the
Ontario Federation of Agriculture to say, “the government is clearly
listening to the concerns of rural Ontario.”
I should also point out that the program has been very enthusiastically
received by the Ontario Farm Animal Council, the Ontario Farm Environmental
Coalition, Conservation Ontario, Environmental Defence and the Association
of Municipalities of Ontario.
This is just one example that demonstrates the value of Bill 43. This
legislation is built around a clear vision, but it is also highly
responsive to community needs. We have a Bill that is clear in its
goals, but flexible to allow local decision-makers to choose their
own best path forward.
It reflects the desires of environmentalists to take a preventive
approach, but also listens to the needs of the farmers and property
owners who are the stewards of their land.
Speaker, I know that every member of this house supports the underlying
principle of Bill 43 – which is that everyone living in Ontario has
a fundamental right to safe, clean drinking water. In order to safeguard
that right, treatment is simply not enough.
Justice O’Connor pointed out in his report on the Walkerton inquiry
that Ontario needs a multi-barrier approach for water protection –
a system with numerous built-in safeguards that protect our water
from source to tap. Protecting our water begins with preventing its
contamination.
We share that vision. Prevention is the fundamental goal of the proposed
legislation contained in Bill 43. The passage of this Bill will mean
that 12 of Justice O’Connor’s recommendations will be addressed. But
more than that, it will start a whole new chapter in the history of
how we manage our supply of water.
It all comes down to trust.
People need to be able to trust that their water is safe to drink,
and that the water sources they rely on are free from pollution. If
this public confidence is lost, the results can be devastating.
With the passage of the Clean Water Act, communities in Ontario will
start adopting a watershed-based approach to prevention. Just as importantly,
they will not have to develop water protection measures in isolation.
They will plan prevention measures across the watersheds they share.
Under Bill 43, communities would form committees to look at the vulnerability
of their drinking water sources, and to evaluate existing and potential
threats to local supplies. The committees would then develop source
protection plans designed to reduce or eliminate those threats.
When these plans are implemented, communities would begin to monitor
and evaluate the effectiveness of the prevention measures. Over time,
the plans themselves will be reviewed and updated – to enhance the
protection they provide against existing threats, and ensure they
respond to new ones.
For some communities, these source protection planning activities
they will carry out may well be the first opportunity they have had
to identify threats to their water supplies. In other communities,
source protection activities may represent the continuation of work
that has already been started.
Either way, it is clear that local communities are in the best position
to develop and implement effective protection measures to safeguard
their water supplies.
Speaker, we heard the concerns of property owners and farmers. They
agree that it is important to reduce threats to our drinking water,
but they were concerned about what it would mean for their land. We
have taken their concerns to heart.
Many threats to drinking water can be managed locally through voluntary
efforts.
We have replaced the system of permits and permit officials that was
originally proposed with a negotiated risk management approach. This
change recognizes the tremendous work that’s already being done on
a voluntary basis. And it is similar to the stewardship activities
that are now common in a number of regions.
Risk management officials will be required to have appropriate training
and qualifications to develop plans with property owners. For instance,
an official working with farmers would need to have training in bio-security,
health and safety protocols.
Speaker, we also know that source water protection plans need to be
based on sound, scientific principles and good research. And they
must be developed in consultation with all members of the community.
We have already committed $120 million dollars for planning to help
communities and their partners study and assess their watersheds,
undertake water budgets and ensure that they get the science right.
A great deal of work is already under way, and the magnitude of what’s
being accomplished is truly remarkable. There is no doubt that it
is the largest scientific exercise ever undertaken in Ontario to better
understand our water resources.
To protect drinking water supplies effectively, we first need to know
how much water we have, how much is in reserve, how our water supplies
replenish themselves, and how those supplies could be threatened,
both now and in the future.
Right now across Ontario, conservation authorities and municipalities
are using leading-edge research and technology to build comprehensive
maps of their surface and groundwater resources. This research will
help them develop local source protection plans for watersheds across
the province.
We recognize that there will be implementation costs involved with
this work. And because every region of Ontario has its own unique
characteristics and challenges, it’s difficult to say precisely what
the costs for each community will be.
The need to adapt prevention measures to fit local needs is one of
the greatest strengths of the proposed Clean Water Act. Instead of
opting for a central model that would impose the same set of protection
measures for everyone, we are relying on the communities themselves
to tell us what they need to implement their local protection plans.
Local source protection committees represent a broad spectrum of stakeholders,
including municipalities, businesses, the health sector and the public.
And each committee will need to look carefully at the research findings,
technical studies and risk assessments, to come up with prevention
measures that deal with the vulnerable areas they’ve identified.
Speaker, it is clear that the cost of implementing these plans will
vary somewhat from one community to another across the province. But
we already have two excellent examples of what we can expect in this
regard.
Waterloo Region and Oxford County were early advocates of source protection
planning, and these municipalities are now working to implement the
plans they have developed to protect their drinking water sources.
I am pleased to report that at this stage, their implementation costs
appear to be quite manageable and moderate.
Implementation costs to homeowners in these communities range from
about 75 cents per household in Waterloo Region to around $1.50 a
month per household in Oxford County.
Mr. Speaker, the government is very much aware that Bill 43 is vital
legislation for people and communities throughout this province. As
a result, we have taken the time and effort to undertake extensive
consultation, to get it right.
We have taken Bill 43 through committee hearings line-by-line. We
have also taken it on the road – from a historic town hall in Walkerton
to the chambers of Queen’s Park … from a church hall in the Town of
Bath to convention centres in Cornwall and Peterborough.
We also had an extensive legislative debate on this bill during second
reading. And that debate resulted in a number of very useful suggestions
from members on both sides of the house.
Since I introduced this legislation last December, I have visited
many communities around the province. I have spoken with people about
the proposed Clean Water Act and listened to their views and concerns
about the best ways to protect our drinking water.
I’ve seen the excellent local efforts that are under way first-hand.
And whether I was speaking with the Mayor of North Bay … or the councilors
of Essex County … or farm groups in Waterloo … or conservation authority
staff in Belleville … the message I heard was consistent and clear.
People right across Ontario agree that water protection is a shared
responsibility – and that the most effective way to protect local
water is through local involvement.
Speaker, our government has listened to people’s comments and heard
their concerns. And in response to the extensive feedback we received
from stakeholders, we have worked hard to amend the Bill to make it
even stronger.
We have expressly recognized that incentives, education and outreach
programs may be used as source protection tools.
We extended the period for property owners to appeal risk management
plans from 15 to 60 days.
We removed the limit of 16 members on source protection committees,
so that they can be more flexible and representative of the local
watershed community.
We designed the Bill to afford better protection of Great Lakes water
quality. As members may know, the Great Lakes supply about 70 per
cent of our people with their drinking water, and Bill 43 requires
policies to be included in source protection plans to help achieve
Great Lakes targets established by the Minister.
Bill 43 also breaks new ground by recognizing First Nations communities
and their need to have their water sources protected, by allowing
First Nations drinking water systems to be considered as part of the
source protection planning process, should the First Nation want to
participate.
Over the past several months, my staff has worked with First Nations
on ways to protect their drinking water sources under the proposed
Clean Water Act – and on how First Nations who want to participate
can play an active part developing source water protection plans across
their watersheds. Consultation with First Nations regarding their
participation in watershed source protection plans will be important
as we move forward.
I believe the amendments we have made will result in stronger, more
effective legislation. And I want to take this opportunity to thank
the hundreds of people who participated in the consultation process
– including members of this House – for the high level of interest
they have shown in the legislation, and their commitment to protecting
Ontario’s drinking water sources for future generations.
Speaker, the passage of Bill 43 will put Ontario in the forefront
of drinking water protection across North America. It will help safeguard
the quality of our environment, and the health of our people.
Bill 43 represents a key step towards protecting the water resources
on which we all rely, and preserving the tremendous quality of life
we all enjoy. It’s what the people of this province want. It’s what
they deserve.
I would therefore like to invite all members to join me in supporting
the speedy passage of this historic and tremendously important legislation.
Thank you, Speaker.
- end -
![]()
This site is maintained by the Government of Ontario
Privacy |
Important Notices
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2007
Last modified: Tuesday October 21 2008
Last Modified: Friday January 26 2007 |