| Location: Ministry Home > Air > Ozone Depleting Substances > Frequently Asked Questions |
An Ozone Depletion Prevention (ODP) card is required to purchase and handle refrigerants in Ontario. An ODP card is a certificate indicating that the holder has successfully completed an environmental awareness training course to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Environment and Energy.
No. While the ODP card allows its holder to purchase and handle refrigerants, it is not an indication of the holders technical qualifications or ability to service equipment. Technical certification or licensing may be required under other legislation.
Various technical qualifications may be needed in addition to the ODP Card. For example, the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities has developed the voluntary trade of Appliance Service Technicians, which also covers work on domestic appliances and window-mounted units. Also, in order to service anything larger than a single-phase, hermetically sealed, domestic self-contained unit with a factory mass-produced system, precharged with refrigerant, (e.g., central AC system), you need to possess a certificate of qualification as a Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Mechanic from the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities.
All ODP cards that were issued before June 30, 2001 have been extended. As of July 1, 2001, depending on your last name, your card expires:
|
Last Name |
Date by which you must recertify your ODP Card |
|---|---|
|
A-G |
December 31, 2002 |
|
H-P |
December 31, 2003 |
|
Q-Z |
December 31, 2004 |
Before your card expires, you must write a recertification examination. Upon successful completion of this test, you will be issued a card that is valid for three years.
It is expected that you will receive further information about the recertification process approximately a year before your card expires.
If you received your initial ODP Card training and certification after June 30, 2001, you will be given an ODP Card that expires 3 years after it was issued.
If you want information on where and when you can enroll in an ODP course please contact the Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Institute (HRAI) at (905) 602-4700 or at 1-800-267-2231 or visit their website at www.hrai.ca.
Contact the Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Institute (HRAI) at (905) 602-4700 or 1-800-267-2231. You can also fax the HRAI a letter requesting replacement of the card with your name, address, ODP number and credit card information at (905) 602-1197. There is a cost for a replacement card.
Yes. The Refrigerants Regulation (O.Reg 189/94) requires that all persons who purchase and handle refrigerants have an ODP Card.
No. An Ontario ODP card is required to purchase and handle refrigerants in Ontario.
People who hold cards issued by other provinces should contact HRAI (905-602-4700 or 1-800-267-2231) for information on obtaining an Ontario card.
In addition to changes to the technician certification program, the Ministry of Environment and Energy has made changes to enhance the enforceability of the regulation.
The ministry has:
The ministry has also made some administrative changes to the refrigerants Regulation. The ministry:
All technicians who hold ODP cards are now required to keep records of use. These records must contain:
These records would be kept by each technician for a minimum of 2 years and must be made available to ministry staff upon request.
After January 1, 2002, no person shall refill an air-conditioning unit of a motor vehicle with any refrigerant containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs including freon or R-12). This measure is a refill ban, not a use ban. This means that when refrigerant needs to be added to your system (usually because of a leak or a repair), you have to convert your air-conditioner to run on alternative, more environmentally friendly refrigerant. Alternatively, you may be able to discontinue use or have your air conditioning system removed from your vehicle.
Conversion is expected to cost the average Ontario motorist around $320, or approximately the same as repairing the leak and refilling it with the original refrigerant. Since the price for CFC refrigerants is increasing, this conversion is cost-effective and will pay off in the long run.
Vehicles manufactured before the end of 1995 may have air-conditioning units that contain a CFC-based (chlorofluorocarbon-based) refrigerant. A label under the hood or inside the drivers door should identify the refrigerant used.
No. refrigerant must not be added to any vehicle that may be leaking. A test must first be done to find out if there is a leak in the AC system. Once a leak test is performed, the system must be tagged with the results of the test, including:
1. the date of the test,
2. the name of the person who conducted the leak test,
3. the ODP number and expiry date appearing on the persons ODP card,
4. the results of the test, and
5. if there is a leak in the equipment, a statement that no refrigerant shall be added to the equipment until the leak is repaired.
Furthermore, after January 1, 2002, no person shall refill an air-conditioning unit of a motor vehicle with refrigerants containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
Leak tests are to be performed in accordance with the practices set out in the Environmental Code of Practice for Elimination of Fluorocarbon Emissions from Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems, which is available from Environment Canada (http://www2.ec.gc.ca/ozone/refcode.htm).
Yes. Appropriately qualified people certified under s.21 of O. R.189/94 can use refrigerants while performing a leak test but they must follow the rules of the Society of Automobile Engineers (SAE) [Standard J 1628, Technician procedure for using electronic refrigerant leak detectors for service in mobile air conditioning systems and Standard J 1627, Rating criteria for electronic refrigerant leak detectors]. Copies can be purchased on the SAE Web site (http://www.sae.org/), by telephone at (724) 776-4841 or by faxing them at (724) 776-5760.
However, it is important to note that CFC-based refrigerants (e.g., R-12) cannot be used to refill mobile air conditioners after January 1, 2002.
A new tag is to be attached to the AC system after each leak test. If all the leaks in the system are repaired, a new tag should be put on the system indicating that there are no leaks. The tag has to be visible to any mechanic who might be working on the system in the future. The tag can be placed on the inside of the drivers side door frame or on any part of the AC system (compressor or hose). Old tags can then be removed. Old tags can be removed only if new tags are going to be placed on the system.
If no leak is found, then refrigerant may be added to the system after it has been tagged as having no leaks. However, it is important to note that CFC-based refrigerants (e.g., R-12) cannot be used to refill mobile air conditioners after January 1, 2002.
Tags can be purchased from most companies that sell business forms. Some associations have also developed tags that comply with the regulations. Tags must contain the appropriate information outlined in the regulation.
No. The garage may only extract the refrigerant which it may have injected into the system to perform the leak test. The owner of the vehicle owns the refrigerant and must decide when and where to repair the leak. A mechanic should not remove it without the permission of the vehicle owner.
If the refrigerant is removed without this permission, the vehicle owner may only recover that refrigerant if s/he produces a certified refrigerant container in which to transport the refrigerant. Alternatively, if the leak in the AC system is fixed and the refrigerant is non-ozone-depleting, the system can then be recharged with the refrigerant that was removed. Owners should be aware that after January 1, 2002, no person shall refill an air-conditioning unit of a motor vehicle with any refrigerant containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
No. Once a garage has informed the owner of a vehicle that there is a leak in the AC system responsibility is transferred to the owner. Owners can decide to leave the repair shop with the car and any refrigerant that was in the system when it came in. Under the law, the owner is then knowingly venting and will have to have the AC fixed before any more refrigerant can be added. Regardless, a tag must be placed on the car with the results of the test.
Permitting the discharge of a refrigerant into the natural environment is illegal in Ontario. Once the owner of an AC system is made aware his/her system is leaking, the owner is then considered to be permitting the discharge of a refrigerant into the natural environment.
Transport Canada regulates the containers in which refrigerant gases are stored according to the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) B339, s.24.2.4, s. 24.2.5 and s.24.2.9. Normal pressure vessels must be re-tested every ten years but since used refrigerants are corrosive, pressure vessels storing them must be tested every five years. Testing can be done at any Transport Canada approved testing facility. For more information, contact Transport Canada at (416) 973-9820.
Any suspicious AC servicing should be reported to your district office of the Ministry of Environment and Energy or the 24 hour Pollution Hotline at 1-866-MOE-TIPS (1-866-663-8477).
These products are designed to seal minor holes as refrigerant leaks out. The use of this product as a preventative maintenance practice (i.e., adding this product into the system after it has been certified as leak-free) is legal in Ontario. The use of this product as a repair method for a leaking air conditioner is not legal in Ontario if it requires the addition of refrigerant into the system without performing a leak test first.
Currently, the Ministry of Environment and Energy does not offer a recommendation regarding top-up refrigerants. Contact your car dealer to see whether or not using a top-up refrigerant might invalidate your car warranty.
Currently, all suitable alternatives to ODS are legal for use as refrigerants in Ontario. The Ministry of Environment and Energy does not currently endorse, approve or disapprove of any alternative refrigerants. It is the responsibility of those seeking alternatives to determine whether a particular product is appropriate for their process or use (see below).
No Canadian authority currently provides formal advice about the acceptability of alternatives. However, the US EPA provides technical evaluations of substitute, drop in or top-up refrigerants. Its evaluations are available on the Significant New Alternative Policy Web site at www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/snap. Environment Canada has an Ozone-Depleting Substances Alternatives and Suppliers List which also provides information and has recently established a panel which will be reviewing alternatives and making recommendations. This list can be obtained from their Web site at www.ec.gc.ca/ozone/archive/altlist/altlist.htm.
In Canada, the Federal-Provincial Working Group on Controls Harmonization (Ozone Depleting Substances) is conducting on-going discussions on this matter and does not recommend the use of hydrocarbon-based refrigerant alternatives in systems not designed to contain flammable refrigerants.
There are currently five regulations under Ontarios Environmental Protection Act (see Part VI of the act) which deal directly with ozone depleting substances:
Reg. 356: Ozone Depleting Substances Regulation in General (pressurized containers, flexible foam, rigid insulation foam)
O. Reg. 189/94: refrigerants Regulation.
O. Reg. 413/94: Halon Fire Extinguishing Equipment.
O. Reg. 717/94: Solvents Regulation.
O. Reg. 718/94: Sterilants Regulation.
Sections 30 to 42 of the General Waste Management Regulation (Reg. 347) deal with the disposal of mobile and stationary refrigerant waste.
These regulations are available in the "Treaties, Statutes and Regulations" (/envision/Ozone/law.html) section of this Web site.
In the case of ODS regulations, both federal and provincial regulations need to be implemented.
The Solvents Regulation (O.Reg. 717/94) was amended to defer the phase-out of a single Class II solvent (known as AK 225) until December 31, 2008. All other Class II solvents were banned on July 1, 2001. The Ministry of Environment and Energy does not believe that there are suitable replacements for this solvent and is providing users an appropriate period of time to find technically and environmentally acceptable alternatives. AK 225 users must also submit annual reports documenting their efforts to reduce solvent use.
Companies who use AK 225 must submit annual reports documenting:
These reports are due on February 15 of each year.
![]()
This site is maintained by the Government of Ontario
Privacy |
Important Notices
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2007
Last modified: Tuesday October 21 2008